Belief revision in a temporal framework
نویسنده
چکیده
We study a branching-time temporal logic of belief revision where the interaction of belief and information is modeled explicitly. The logic is based on three modal operators: a belief operator, an information operator and a next-time operator. We consider three logics of increasing strength. The rst captures the most basic notion of minimal belief revision. The second characterizes the qualitative content of Bayesrule. The third is the logic proposed in [8], where some aspects of its relationship with the AGM theory of belief revision were investigated. We further explore the relationship to AGM with the help of semantic structures that have been used in the rational choice literature. Further strengthening of the logic are also investigated.
منابع مشابه
Knowledge without Modality: A Simplified Framework for Chronological Ignorance
p. 1 Knowledge Without Modality: A Simplified Framework for Chronological Ignorance p. 25 Design Complete Sequential Calculus for Continuous Fixpoint Temporal Logic p. 36 Logical Omniscience and Classical Logic p. 52 Weak Implication: Theory and Applications p. 65 Deriving Inference Rules for Terminological Logics p. 84 Linear Proofs and Linear Logic p. 106 Relevance and Revision About Generali...
متن کاملA Knowledge-Based Framework for Belief Change, Part II: Revision and Update
The study of belief change has been an active area in philosophy and AI. In recent years two special cases of belief change, belief revision and belief update, have been studied in detail. In a companion paper FH94b] we introduced a new framework to model belief change. This framework combines temporal and epistemic modalities with a notion of plausibility, allowing us to examine the changes of...
متن کاملModeling Belief in Dynamic Systems, Part II: Revision and Update
The study of belief change has been an active area in philosophy and AI. In recent years two special cases of belief change, belief revision and belief update, have been studied in detail. In a companion paper (Friedman & Halpern, 1997), we introduce a new framework to model belief change. This framework combines temporal and epistemic modalities with a notion of plausibility, allowing us to ex...
متن کاملYet More Modal Logics of Preference Change and Belief Revision
We contrast Bonanno’s ‘Belief Revision in a Temporal Framework’ [15] with preference change and belief revision from the perspective of dynamic epistemic logic (DEL). For that, we extend the logic of communication and change of [11] with relational substitutions [8] for preference change, and show that this does not alter its properties. Next we move to a more constrained context where belief a...
متن کاملChanging Legal Systems: Abrogation and Annulment. Part II: Temporalised Defeasible Logic
In this paper we propose a temporal extension of Defeasible Logic to model legal modifications, such as abrogation and annulment. Hence, this framework overcomes the difficulty, discussed elsewhere [7], of capturing these modification types using belief and base revision.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006