Belief revision in a temporal framework

نویسنده

  • Giacomo Bonanno
چکیده

We study a branching-time temporal logic of belief revision where the interaction of belief and information is modeled explicitly. The logic is based on three modal operators: a belief operator, an information operator and a next-time operator. We consider three logics of increasing strength. The …rst captures the most basic notion of minimal belief revision. The second characterizes the qualitative content of Bayes’rule. The third is the logic proposed in [8], where some aspects of its relationship with the AGM theory of belief revision were investigated. We further explore the relationship to AGM with the help of semantic structures that have been used in the rational choice literature. Further strengthening of the logic are also investigated.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Knowledge without Modality: A Simplified Framework for Chronological Ignorance

p. 1 Knowledge Without Modality: A Simplified Framework for Chronological Ignorance p. 25 Design Complete Sequential Calculus for Continuous Fixpoint Temporal Logic p. 36 Logical Omniscience and Classical Logic p. 52 Weak Implication: Theory and Applications p. 65 Deriving Inference Rules for Terminological Logics p. 84 Linear Proofs and Linear Logic p. 106 Relevance and Revision About Generali...

متن کامل

A Knowledge-Based Framework for Belief Change, Part II: Revision and Update

The study of belief change has been an active area in philosophy and AI. In recent years two special cases of belief change, belief revision and belief update, have been studied in detail. In a companion paper FH94b] we introduced a new framework to model belief change. This framework combines temporal and epistemic modalities with a notion of plausibility, allowing us to examine the changes of...

متن کامل

Modeling Belief in Dynamic Systems, Part II: Revision and Update

The study of belief change has been an active area in philosophy and AI. In recent years two special cases of belief change, belief revision and belief update, have been studied in detail. In a companion paper (Friedman & Halpern, 1997), we introduce a new framework to model belief change. This framework combines temporal and epistemic modalities with a notion of plausibility, allowing us to ex...

متن کامل

Yet More Modal Logics of Preference Change and Belief Revision

We contrast Bonanno’s ‘Belief Revision in a Temporal Framework’ [15] with preference change and belief revision from the perspective of dynamic epistemic logic (DEL). For that, we extend the logic of communication and change of [11] with relational substitutions [8] for preference change, and show that this does not alter its properties. Next we move to a more constrained context where belief a...

متن کامل

Changing Legal Systems: Abrogation and Annulment. Part II: Temporalised Defeasible Logic

In this paper we propose a temporal extension of Defeasible Logic to model legal modifications, such as abrogation and annulment. Hence, this framework overcomes the difficulty, discussed elsewhere [7], of capturing these modification types using belief and base revision.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006